Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

Tag Board

medicine: good article!
Cecilia: You used a lot of supporting text which made the paper very good!
Maryanna: For the Jilting of granny weatherall i thought you did alot of good description.
Amber: You make some really good points! Awesome!
beth: hey!
becca: that's cool, but what exactly is Steinbeck trying to convey?
Whitney : Smart point of veiw.
nephew: chris was good job
Maryanna: Verrry Impressive! Nice Work! ^^
Caleb: I liked ur view of both situations
Amber: Wow! I'm really impressed with the way you wrote that. And you did make a few very good points.
Anonymous: Your story is really good and life like good job.
nephew: im bored, really bored. so...... tag your it
Anonymous: Why do we write if we are told how to do it? And why do we speak if were not heard. Why try if were set up to fail.
Nephew: I have a new post if you want to read it
Cecilia: Actually I have never been to the ocean but I would really love to go!!
Robert: Hello I'm thirsty!
RAINBOW: PIZZA!!
sarah: hey kristin what are you doing well i am just here in creative writting doing nothing hahaha dont tell mrs. harden what do you mean it is long im proud.Love ya SARAH
Brooke: Hey Kristin what is up? You're so smart and write so well why can't I be more like you? gosshhhh lol love you tons byes
Amy: Welcome to the community and good luck with your journal!
Michi: poetry very nice
venom75: Welcome to the community.
Eric: welcome, hello
Anne: hello and welcome

Please type in the four characters shown in the black box.

Thursday, January 12th 2006

11:24 AM

fairness

Fairness

 

As I read the short stories, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and, “The Lady or the Tiger” by Frank R. Stockton, I was immediately reminded of the principle of fairness, and that’s what the topic of this paper is.

In Shirley Jackson’s, “The Lottery,” the villagers view the lottery as a fair way to eliminate people from their society. They see it as fair because that’s the way it has always been and because of the randomness of the selection process. However, how is the idea that you don’t get to choose your own destiny fair? We, as a society, don’t realize that we carry on foolish, unfair, and wrong traditions simply because we have always done them.

In Frank R. Stockton’s, “The Lady or the Tiger,” the narrator explains the “fairness” of the king’s court. He tells us that it’s fair because the one on “trial” has his destiny in his own hands because he gets to choose whichever door he wants, and so, by his choosing either the good door or the bad door, he is displaying either his innocence or guilt. There are a couple things wrong with this system, however. The first thing wrong that I see is the fact that even though the one on trial can choose the door he wants, he doesn’t know what is behind either door, so he isn’t making an informed choice, and so, not a choice at all. This isn’t fair because he isn’t even given the opportunity to be informed to make the best choice. The second thing wrong is that, regardless of which door the accused chooses, it could still be imminent doom. For our purposes, let’s say that a married man was in the arena. If he chooses the door the tiger is behind, he gets eaten. If he chooses the door the lady is behind, he gets married—but he already has a wife and family of his own. What if he doesn’t like the maid behind the door? Is not marrying her a punishment in and of itself? What I’m trying to say is that choosing a “reward” for the accused may not be a reward at all! It may, in fact, be worse than death by tiger.

In conclusion, the ideas of fairness presented in these two stories are so askew that they make the reader choke in disgust, but at the same time are so comparable to ideas in our own society that it frightens me to think of the things we do to retain power or keep tradition alive as in “The Lottery,” or our twisted political ideals of fairness or the way things should be run as in “The Lady or the Tiger.”

7 from the peanut gallery.

Posted by Rebecca Lumsden:

I like how you were straight forward about what you think is and isn't fair.
Tuesday, January 17th 2006 @ 10:51 AM

Posted by Sarai Chavez:

I like your paper very much.
Tuesday, January 17th 2006 @ 11:07 AM

Posted by cecilia tijerina villareal:

Comisión de Derechos Humanos del Distrito Federal
Av. Chapultepec No. 49, Col. Centro C.P. 06040 Delegación Cuauhtémoc México D.F.
Teléfono:5229 5600
www.cdhdf.org.mx
e-mail: cdhdf@ms.cdhdf.org.mx



cecilia
tijerina virrareal amante
de amlo
de maxime
woodside
de ana maria
alvarado
de valle de bravo
de lo peor
en mexico
amlo
prd:-?
Tuesday, March 27th 2007 @ 8:49 AM

Posted by Stephen:

Posted by AMSIF Coordinación Nacional A.C. - [ Translate this page ]Los miembros de la Asociación Mexicana p:

AMSIF Coordinación Nacional A.C. - [ Translate this page ]Los miembros de la Asociación Mexicana para la superación Integral de la Familia (AMSIF) trabajamos en bien de las mujeres y sus familias mediante la ...
www.amsif.org.mx/ - 11k - Cached - Similar pages
:):):)
Tuesday, July 8th 2008 @ 8:09 PM

Posted by jwfan.com/ - 72k - Cached - Similar pages:

jwfan.com/ - 72k - Cached - Similar pages
viejo llevo viejo a ombudsman el alarcon viejo herdor se ira
Wednesday, July 9th 2008 @ 10:03 AM

Posted by Sarah Branecky:

Your thoughts helped open many new doors in discussing the symbolism of the father/daughter relationship as a power trip for the king! Thanks :)
Wednesday, July 30th 2008 @ 6:39 PM

Post New Comment

 BraveJournal Member Non-Member
No Smilies More Smilies »

Please type in the four characters shown in the black box.